UPDATE: Two Days After Proof Framed the D.C. Documents Dustup As Concerning Federal Regulations Regarding NARA and VPOTUSes, a Second VPOTUS Is Snared By the “NARA Trap”
Proof presaged today’s major breaking news: that draconian federal regulations regarding NARA and vice presidents all but ensure outgoing vice presidents will accidentally retain sensitive documents.
Less than two days after a breaking news report at Proof that reframed the document “scandal” currently plaguing Joe Biden as a problem with federal regulations dealing with NARA (the National Archives and Records Administration) and vice presidents in particular—an esoteric revelation that nevertheless could immediately aid Biden and his administration, as well as the Democratic Party, in distinguishing between the small number of sensitive and classified documents outgoing vice president Biden accidentally retained in 2017 from the more than sixty boxes of sensitive and classified documents premeditatedly stolen by outgoing president Donald Trump over a period of months in late 2020 and early 2021—the major breaking news today is that Vice President Mike Pence also had sensitive and classified documents in his possession after he left office in 2021.
Here’s the CNN report, and here (below) a CNN graphic that adequately summarizes it:
{Note: As Proof readers will be aware, among the many other distinctions between the Biden and Trump cases are that Team Biden’s first discovery of wrongly retained documents was revealed to NARA within twenty-four hours, while Trump hid his massive stash of stolen documents in whole or in part from NARA, DOJ, and the FBI for over a year and a half.}
It’s now incumbent upon Biden’s administration and the Democratic Party to publicly empathize with rather than condemn Pence for having documents in his possession that he was not entitled to have—as this breaking news brings into high relief all of the distinctions between the Biden and Trump cases that the former has thus far (in his own person and through subordinates) struggled to articulate in a meaningful way.
The simplest and most correct narrative, now, is this one: NARA, per its regulations, offers round-the-clock expert consulting and even round-the-clock manual labor to assist outgoing American presidents with handling and (as appropriate) retaining or surrendering sensitive and classified documents, while vice presidents are offered no assistance at all. This ensures that vice presidents will accidentally end up with documents they should not, even as it gives former presidents the best opportunity imaginable to get things right.
That Donald Trump did not, nevertheless, get things right—indeed, he shunned all aid from NARA—only further inculpates him, as do all the facts surrounding his case that indicate he stole a large number of documents, over a long period of time, via a course of conduct he personally oversaw, and under circumstances in which he was carefully curating what he took from the White House. That he rejected free NARA aid on top of all this underscores that he didn’t want his deliberate misconduct to be ascertained.
By comparison, outgoing vice presidents Biden and Pence were almost guaranteed to run afoul of records-retention regulations because (a) unlike Donald Trump, their subordinates oversaw their “off-boarding” process with respect to documents, and (b) those subordinates had no expert advice or manpower to call on in their time of need.
Democrats and Biden have one chance to change the narrative—and justly so—in a situation that’s rapidly spiraling out of control because of major-media bothsidesism.
And that urgent narrative sea change starts with empathetically, rather than cynically, speaking out about the situation former vice president Pence now finds himself in.
Great article and clarity on the differences between the handling of classified document between VP's Pence and Biden, in comparison to ex-POTUS Trump.
- Inadvertent vs. Intentional placement of documents.
- Performed by others without NARA guidance and assistance vs. personally overseen in opposition to and rejection of available NARA assistance and guidance.
- Full cooperation in ascertaining inadvertent placement vs. false claims of ownership, misrepresentation to obstruct the return of classified documents, refusal of cooperation for over a year which ultimately required a search warrant to seize the unlawful possession of the documents.
- Incidental amount of a relatively few classified documents vs. a personally overseen effort to carefully select documents; and a planned removal and theft of a massive amount of documents.
- No history of accepting foreign bribes or ethical violations vs. a long history of doing business with foreign dictators, ethical violations, and accepting bribes as the POTUS and previously!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/saudi-funded-lobbyist-paid-for-500-rooms-at-trumps-hotel-after-2016-election/2018/12/05/29603a64-f417-11e8-bc79-68604ed88993_story.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/02/trump-hotel-empty-rooms-016763
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29343938/president-trump-empty-hotel-room-rentals-bribery/
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2020/09/15/trumps-sale-palm-beach-mansion-gains-scrutiny-again/5798386002/
Note: this sale occurred at the peak of the Great Recession, when U.S property values had been reduced as much as 50%. Seller and buyer by statements and behavior treated the property as land value only, which would make a sale even more difficult, in terms of financing and limited buyer appeal, not to mention the price tag. In financial markets, B of A stock had fallen from the mid-thirties to less than $4 per share. Impacted by the real estate depression and a recent bankruptcy of his casino ownership, Trump needed either a loan, a sale, or a gift. A sale was clearly not a possibility at anything near the price that was paid by the Russian oligarch, who had no intention of living in or developing the property. A loan from an institutional lender wasn't available either because the property wouldn't have appraised even for what Trump paid in 2004. At one point Trump claimed he spent 25 million on renovation but that was a lie. He had the fixtures painted gold with gold paint color. It was time to ask Putin for a favor that wouldn't need to be disclosed as s loan from a foreign entity, especially if a Presidential bid was on the horizon.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/why-did-a-russian-pay-95m-to-buy-trumps-palm-beach-mansion/
Even with all of the inflation between 2008 and 2019 (the date of the sale of the third and final lot) the buyer didn't even break even, after the demolition of the existing home which was infected with mold, and featured deferred maintenance and functional obsolesce. The expense of subdividing the lot, covering expenses until the sale of the third lot, and paying real estate commissions yielded buyer a net profit from the deal of zero after investing over $100,000,000 for 11 years. The lack of return on the investment confirms the sale was very different from miraculous. The only remaining question was whether the sale was gift, a personal loan disguised as a sale, or an I owe you to be paid at some future date?
https://therealdeal.com/miami/2019/07/08/russian-oligarch-sells-last-piece-of-former-trump-estate-in-palm-beach-for-37m/
https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/story/lifestyle/real-estate/2019/07/05/updated-exclusive-palm-beach-homes-russian-sells-last-lot-from-trumps-95m-deal-deed-shows/4741731007/
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/follow-money-senator-probes-trumps-95-million-palm/story?id=52970095
My guess it was an IOU:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/17/politics/trump-soft-on-russia/index.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBtsNNXjBPw
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/10/17/donald-trumps-betrayal-of-the-kurds-is-a-blow-to-americas-credibility
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/07/08/wagner-group-libya-oil-russia-war/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/news/russia-building-two-new-military-bases-syrian-coast-676169215 (Facing NATO's southern flank)
https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/steve-chapman/ct-column-trump-oil-deal-gas-pricesi-chapman-20200415-iwwn3cpegngo5krsm6tfdycqvy-story.html
Putin would have never tried to take all of Ukraine, but not for Trump's unexplained foreign policy of Russian appeasement, or as Trump would always repeat from day one: "...getting along with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing." What he didn't say is it was only a good thing for Trump and Putin.
History of legal battle between Trump and the Justice Department:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-documents-mar-a-lago-court-fight-timeline/
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/court-denies-trumps-request-to-intervene-in-mar-a-lago-documents-case/
I wonder how many top secret documents the extreme right insurrectionist are squirreling away right now.