New reporting suggests that Senate Republicans may try to use me as part of a bid to scuttle one of Joe Biden's Pentagon nominations—a sad misdirection doomed to fail.
I would like to add that Joe Biden and Kamela Harris were also followers of yours, until they took over their official elected accounts. Hurray for their following you in their state of liminality.
Red Herring is correct. Every one should consider why it is that knowledge of your chronicled information is considered anything other than information gathering. You gather the information and present it in a cohesive fashion that is easy to understand. Why do people fear you? That was rhetorical.
Just a couple mistypes, I believe I caught: "In turned out that in certain respects it did" should be "It turned out...", and "Center for the National Internet" should be "Center for the National Interest".
Interesting article. It helps me get a bit more up to speed on your work considering I've only recently discovered your stuff and there is SO MUCH and I have limited time (plus I read slowly). ;)
Now off topic that I just want to slide your way (I know you've done some COVID-19 investigation). Maybe better for an AMA sometime, but I discovered this video last night and notice that there seems to be a lot of silence and/or excrement tossing surrounding it (see Wall Street Journal), which reminds me of the January 5th meeting that's been curiously ignored. Is this something you would ever look more deeply into with your work?
I've been researching the topic since I discovered it late last night and the professionals trying to bring the info to light sure seem to be well-vetted, for instance, one of the main doctors, Paul E. Marik, MD, FCCP, FCCM "has written over 400 peer reviewed journal articles, 50 book chapters and authored four critical care books." They are actively working with COVID-19 patients as well.
Contact me if you want any of the materials I've discovered that have provided quite a well-rounded initial understanding of the science, as well as the "cover-up", or maybe just another loud "ignore", from major media.
I would like to add that Joe Biden and Kamela Harris were also followers of yours, until they took over their official elected accounts. Hurray for their following you in their state of liminality.
thank you for this clarity
Red Herring is correct. Every one should consider why it is that knowledge of your chronicled information is considered anything other than information gathering. You gather the information and present it in a cohesive fashion that is easy to understand. Why do people fear you? That was rhetorical.
Just a couple mistypes, I believe I caught: "In turned out that in certain respects it did" should be "It turned out...", and "Center for the National Internet" should be "Center for the National Interest".
Interesting article. It helps me get a bit more up to speed on your work considering I've only recently discovered your stuff and there is SO MUCH and I have limited time (plus I read slowly). ;)
Now off topic that I just want to slide your way (I know you've done some COVID-19 investigation). Maybe better for an AMA sometime, but I discovered this video last night and notice that there seems to be a lot of silence and/or excrement tossing surrounding it (see Wall Street Journal), which reminds me of the January 5th meeting that's been curiously ignored. Is this something you would ever look more deeply into with your work?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4929855/user-clip-dr-pierre-kory-president-flccc-alliance-testifies-senate-committee-homeland-security [about a 9 minute video clip]
I've been researching the topic since I discovered it late last night and the professionals trying to bring the info to light sure seem to be well-vetted, for instance, one of the main doctors, Paul E. Marik, MD, FCCP, FCCM "has written over 400 peer reviewed journal articles, 50 book chapters and authored four critical care books." They are actively working with COVID-19 patients as well.
Contact me if you want any of the materials I've discovered that have provided quite a well-rounded initial understanding of the science, as well as the "cover-up", or maybe just another loud "ignore", from major media.
Thanks again, Seth. Cheers.
Please provide a post-hearing update re: the hearing and your concerns.