It required an intense and quiet setting (as a non-lawyer) to read and fully grok this analysis but.....brilliant! I now see that one more step must be taken, since the SCOTUS has only now brought forth their decision, in essence elucidating a way for Section 3 to spring into action (much like a springing durable power of attorney) but i…
It required an intense and quiet setting (as a non-lawyer) to read and fully grok this analysis but.....brilliant! I now see that one more step must be taken, since the SCOTUS has only now brought forth their decision, in essence elucidating a way for Section 3 to spring into action (much like a springing durable power of attorney) but in a rather sly manner in which the liberal three apparently weren't even aware of its implications vis-a-vis majority votes already taken regarding impeachment/removal. You've developed a fully vetted persuasive argument. My only question at this point is who is the party with the greatest "standing" to bring it back to the court?
It required an intense and quiet setting (as a non-lawyer) to read and fully grok this analysis but.....brilliant! I now see that one more step must be taken, since the SCOTUS has only now brought forth their decision, in essence elucidating a way for Section 3 to spring into action (much like a springing durable power of attorney) but in a rather sly manner in which the liberal three apparently weren't even aware of its implications vis-a-vis majority votes already taken regarding impeachment/removal. You've developed a fully vetted persuasive argument. My only question at this point is who is the party with the greatest "standing" to bring it back to the court?