There are some points they made that I agree with but both sides are playing political games. I would rather see the Justice Department go after all the players in this conspiracy that you have laid out in your tweets Seth!
They're admitting repeatedly that Trump is no longer the president. Yet Trump refuses to refer to himself as ex-president. If he truly believes he won and is the rightful president, then that defense doesn't seem to make sense.
Since they bring up the recording of trump's speech, they just need to play it during the trial. It's pretty obvious when you listen to it, what he meant. Not sure referencing the recording is going to help their case lol
Assuming that a president isn't above the law entirely, what other mechanism is available to hold them accountable for actions taken while in office? Or is the argument that a president IS above the law and there is no way to hold them accountable?
Maybe you can make better sense of this word salad? On the one had they acknowledge he is no longer President, on the other they refer to “President”. Help us better understand Seth
Had to double check my dictionary on that one and thank goodness I did🤣because all 1st definitions I found were “disembowelment” but then read one def said “to take out and or remove” that certainly made more sense🤣still giggling
Certainly sounds like there is some deeper cryptic messaging in there for his Republican Senators to hear? Or am I just starting to think like they do?? I am a truth seeker so? If I should get too far out in space with the laser beams..you WILL reel a sister back in won’t you?
Legal Defense 7 strikes me as diabolically clever. It's not designed to meet a strict standard of logic, it's designed to give R Senators some wiggle room to vote No.
There are some points they made that I agree with but both sides are playing political games. I would rather see the Justice Department go after all the players in this conspiracy that you have laid out in your tweets Seth!
They need the justice department to go after it in addition to political accountability at the same time.
They're admitting repeatedly that Trump is no longer the president. Yet Trump refuses to refer to himself as ex-president. If he truly believes he won and is the rightful president, then that defense doesn't seem to make sense.
Since they bring up the recording of trump's speech, they just need to play it during the trial. It's pretty obvious when you listen to it, what he meant. Not sure referencing the recording is going to help their case lol
Assuming that a president isn't above the law entirely, what other mechanism is available to hold them accountable for actions taken while in office? Or is the argument that a president IS above the law and there is no way to hold them accountable?
Ha ha. The “Unites” State Senate
Maybe you can make better sense of this word salad? On the one had they acknowledge he is no longer President, on the other they refer to “President”. Help us better understand Seth
What do you make of it, Seth?
Had to double check my dictionary on that one and thank goodness I did🤣because all 1st definitions I found were “disembowelment” but then read one def said “to take out and or remove” that certainly made more sense🤣still giggling
Oh and I too am anxiously awaiting Seths analysis
Cool, cool
Yes, Seth is amazing. I look forward to his analysis.
Certainly sounds like there is some deeper cryptic messaging in there for his Republican Senators to hear? Or am I just starting to think like they do?? I am a truth seeker so? If I should get too far out in space with the laser beams..you WILL reel a sister back in won’t you?
Legal Defense 7 strikes me as diabolically clever. It's not designed to meet a strict standard of logic, it's designed to give R Senators some wiggle room to vote No.
This reads like a defense made by people who do not want their client to prevail.