Days ago, Proof suggested the likelihood of a link between Roger Stone and Ethan Nordean. A prominent website staffed by national security experts just located it.
Great work! Have you considered doing a summary on Youtube occasionally? Makes it easier to get the information across to others who don't spend as much time reading.
Lol. You guys asking this guy to do more work for you... for free... all because you don’t want to read. << this is the problem with our country. Sit down. Take the time to read... mull it over, reflect. DO SOME ACTUAL THINKING inside that head.
Did Stone think the notion of buying ‘protective gear’ for his own security detail would give him cover for what he was actually doing ie fundraising for the insurrectionists?
If the clent being protected has to buy the equipment for his limited security detail, it's time to hire new bodyguards from an actual, legal security company, not just your militia friends. Smells fishy.
I have yet to read the underlying Just Security article so perhaps my question is answered there:
Is the ‘conspiracy’ link not just the identical language/request about ‘protective gear’ but that Stone was trying to buy protective gear for insurrectionists in his own security detail because he ‘knew’ these men were planning to storm the capital?
Great work! Have you considered doing a summary on Youtube occasionally? Makes it easier to get the information across to others who don't spend as much time reading.
Fantastic idea. The world has been conditioned to have short attention spans. Videos would be effective.
And a YouTube video illustrated like a graphic novel and narrated by the man that read the Proof audible books would be deliciously meta
Lol. You guys asking this guy to do more work for you... for free... all because you don’t want to read. << this is the problem with our country. Sit down. Take the time to read... mull it over, reflect. DO SOME ACTUAL THINKING inside that head.
First I'm a paid subscriber so fuck you. Secondly, fuck you. Thats all the effort i have for you, hater.
I don’t know how much you think you’re owed for $5 😆 ... but thanks for all the fucks you gave me. I was running low. 😂
Its like you never sleep. Thank you for watching out for us!
damn, amazing as always!
To put it another way:
Did Stone think the notion of buying ‘protective gear’ for his own security detail would give him cover for what he was actually doing ie fundraising for the insurrectionists?
As always, following the money will be key.
If the clent being protected has to buy the equipment for his limited security detail, it's time to hire new bodyguards from an actual, legal security company, not just your militia friends. Smells fishy.
Excellent, thought provoking post as per usual - thank you.
Great work Seth!
What are the odds Stone gets picked up before trial starts? Has there been more news about Manafort lately?
Plausible deniability?
Will Stone try to hide his complicity/fore knowledge by alleging he was simply buying ‘protective gear’ for men he hired for his own protection?
I have yet to read the underlying Just Security article so perhaps my question is answered there:
Is the ‘conspiracy’ link not just the identical language/request about ‘protective gear’ but that Stone was trying to buy protective gear for insurrectionists in his own security detail because he ‘knew’ these men were planning to storm the capital?
Did you mean "is not" here?
It is increasingly fanciful—up to impossible—to disbelieve that Stone is one of these unindicted co-conspirators.
This sentence, lovely as it is, is a bit of a mouthful but I believe the prefix ‘dis’ in the word ‘disbelieve’ is the ‘not’ you’re looking for👍
(doh) thank you, skipped right past that... more coffee!
Roger will channel Enrico Caruso, Professor. Take it to the Bank