Days ago, Proof suggested the likelihood of a link between Roger Stone and Ethan Nordean. A prominent website staffed by national security experts just located it.
Great work! Have you considered doing a summary on Youtube occasionally? Makes it easier to get the information across to others who don't spend as much time reading.
Did Stone think the notion of buying ‘protective gear’ for his own security detail would give him cover for what he was actually doing ie fundraising for the insurrectionists?
I have yet to read the underlying Just Security article so perhaps my question is answered there:
Is the ‘conspiracy’ link not just the identical language/request about ‘protective gear’ but that Stone was trying to buy protective gear for insurrectionists in his own security detail because he ‘knew’ these men were planning to storm the capital?
Great work! Have you considered doing a summary on Youtube occasionally? Makes it easier to get the information across to others who don't spend as much time reading.
Its like you never sleep. Thank you for watching out for us!
damn, amazing as always!
To put it another way:
Did Stone think the notion of buying ‘protective gear’ for his own security detail would give him cover for what he was actually doing ie fundraising for the insurrectionists?
As always, following the money will be key.
Excellent, thought provoking post as per usual - thank you.
Great work Seth!
What are the odds Stone gets picked up before trial starts? Has there been more news about Manafort lately?
Plausible deniability?
Will Stone try to hide his complicity/fore knowledge by alleging he was simply buying ‘protective gear’ for men he hired for his own protection?
I have yet to read the underlying Just Security article so perhaps my question is answered there:
Is the ‘conspiracy’ link not just the identical language/request about ‘protective gear’ but that Stone was trying to buy protective gear for insurrectionists in his own security detail because he ‘knew’ these men were planning to storm the capital?
Did you mean "is not" here?
It is increasingly fanciful—up to impossible—to disbelieve that Stone is one of these unindicted co-conspirators.
Roger will channel Enrico Caruso, Professor. Take it to the Bank